ANSWERING “FALLEN ANGELS”
(“End-Time Antichrists”)
Point-by-point discussion answering those
opposing
the Church Administration
part 61
WHAT
HAPPENED IN
#36 TANDANG
SORA
LAST
DECEMBER 15?
First Part
“QC court ordered to conduct
In December 15, 2015 a simple ocular
Inspection of #36 Tandang Sora”
Why did the “Sheriff”
came to #36 Tandang Sora
last December
15, 2015?
It was the order of Quezon City
(QC) regional trial court (RTC). In a court order issued on December 9, QC RTC
Judge Edgar Dalmacio Santos granted the INC lawyers petition for an ocular
inspection of the disputed INC property at #36 Tandang Sora.
Eagle News) –
The Quezon City court is set to inspect the disputed Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC)
property at #36 Tandang Sora on December 15, 2015 at 9:30 AM.
In a court order
issued on December 9, Quezon City regional trial court (RTC) Judge Edgar
Dalmacio Santos granted the INC lawyers’ petition for an ocular inspection of
the said property where ex-INC minister Felix Nathaniel “Angel” Manalo and
sister Lottie Hemedez have been allowed to stay even after their expulsion from
the church last July.
The court
ordered the said inspection “to determine the number of and identities of all
occupants, whether regular or not, as well as persons who visit and allowed
access to the subject property.”
Judge Edgar
Santos also directed Sheriff Neri Loy to “note the number and location of
ingress and egress points” in the compound as well as the procedures
implemented for it.
Aside from the
Sheriff, representatives of the INC and of Angel Manalo’s camps are instructed
to be present during the inspection, along with police officers and barangay
authorities.
The Sheriff was
also directed by the court to make a written report within seven days from the
conclusion of the ocular inspection. He was also directed to provide
copies of the said report to both parties.
[http://www.eaglenews.ph/qc-sheriff-to-inspect-disputed-inc-property-at-no-36-tandang-sora-qc/]
Judge Santos ordered Sheriff
Neri Loy to make an ocular inspection of the said property to “determine the
number and identities of all occupants, whether regular or not, as well as
persons who visit and allowed access to the subject property.”
Why did the QC
court give an order to conduct
an ocular
inspection of the said property?
The court order was part of
the ongoing case filed by the INC in seeking legal injunction of its property
against Angel Manalo and company, as prompted by CCTV-recorded incidents in
which unidentified masked men were coming in and out of the property without
due permission from INC officials.
The court’s
order for inspection is part of the ongoing case which the INC filed against
Angel Manalo and company seeking legal injunction of its property. This was
prompted by CCTV-recorded incidents in which unidentified men wearing masks
were coming in and out of the property without due permission from INC
officials.
Judge Santos of
RTC Branch 222, in the same Omnibus Order, also granted Iglesia Ni Cristo’s
prayer for the respondents Angel Manalo and his companions to be declared in
default.
The court noted
that it “took respondents forty-six (46) days before they filed their answer”.
Under the law, respondents must have submitted their answer within fifteen (15)
days from receipt of summons.
Thus,
respondents Angel Manalo have now lost their right to participate in the trial
of the Petition for Injunction filed by the INC, based on the court order which
found as “untenable” the excuses made by the respondents.
The court,
however, denied the petitioner INC’s prayer that evidence of respondents so far
adduced be “expunged” or deleted from the records. The respondents’ lawyers
have already commenced presentation of evidence in opposition to the issuance
of a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). The court ruled that respondents may
continue presenting further evidence as regards to the TRO issuance.
[http://www.eaglenews.ph/qc-sheriff-to-inspect-disputed-inc-property-at-no-36-tandang-sora-qc/]
Under the law, respondents
Angel Manalo and company, “must have submitted their answer within fifteen (15)
days from receipt of summons.” However, as the court noted, “it took
respondents forty-six (46) days before they filed their answer”. Thus,
respondents Angel Manalo have now lost their right to participate in the trial
of the Petition for Injunction filed by the INC, based on the court order which
found as “untenable” the excuses made by the respondents. This failure on the
respondents is due to the negligence of their lawyer, the reason why their
lawyer Trixie Angeles post an excuse in her FB account on the same day of
December 15:
Conclusion
Thus, what was supposed to take place last December 15 was a simple ocular
inspection ordered by the court to determine the number and identities of the
occupants of #36 Tandang Sora. The respondents Angel Manalo and company made “commotions”
during that day because they were caught unprepared.
Please also read or see Part Two of the
article
WHAT HAPPENED IN #36 TANDANG SORA LAST
DECEMBER 15?
"Angel and Lottie are desperate to establish
their
ownership of #36 Tandang Sora"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Know why more and more people worldwide convert to Iglesia Ni Cristo (Church Of Christ). Learn more about this Church and find out what makes it unique.