“WHAT ARE THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN
THE BIBLE AND QUR’AN?”
part 1
part 1
THE CHRISTIANS REGARD the Bible
as their Sacred Scriptures, where the words of God are written. For true
Christians, the Bible is the sole basis of their faith. Muslims also regard Qur’an
as their Sacred Scriptures, where the
words of God are written. So, what the differences between the two books?
PHYSICAL DIFFERENCES
The Bible is a library (a
collection) of sixty-six (66) books. Written in a span of 1,500 years (Genesis,
the first book, was written about 1447-1407 BC, and Revelation, the last book,
was written about 90-95 AD). The Bible is written by more than forty (40)
inspired writers.
Qur’an is a single book. It is comparable
in length with the New Testament. The “standard Qur’an” was done by a single man.
Take note that if you going to
read the whole Bible, you can see that it seems it was written by a single
writer in particular period or time because of its unity. Remarkable for the
Bible is not a single book but a collection of 66 books, written by 40 men in a
span of 1,500 years. If there is a unity in Qur’an, what’s remarkable about
that for it was done by a single man in a particular time or period?
ON DIVINE INSPIRATION
The Christians firmly believe
that the Bible is divinely inspired. The Muslims also claim that Qur’an is divinely
inspired. “Divine inspiration” means that the one who wrote was truly inspired
by God as prophet or apostle.
The Bible is divinely inspired
for the those who wrote the books are the inspired prophets and apostles
themselves. The first five books (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy)
are written by the inspired prophet Himself, Prophet Moses. The Book of Joshua
was written by Joshua, The books of Samuel written by the prophets Nathan and Gad,
the Book of Isaiah written by Isaiah, and so on.
Contrary to popular belief, it
was not Muhammad who wrote Qur’an, and he never wrote anything. The book called
“Qur’an” never existed during his lifetime. That Qur’an was written during the
lifetime of Muhammad was only a claim of Muslims today, but their hadith and
sahih don’t agree with it. Let us first quote the admission of modern Muslims. In
a book entitled, “Islam in Focus”
this is what they admitted
“…he
consulted (Abu Bakr) the leading authorities and then entrusted Zayd Ibn
Thabit, Muhammad’s Chief Scribe of Revelations, to compile a standard and
complete copy of the Book...” (Islam in Focus, p. 219)
This book authored and published
by Muslims admitted that the “standard Qur’an” was done by Zayd Ibn Thabit who
Abu Bakr commissioned to do so. Abu Bakr was the “first caliph” (he succeeded
Muhammad). Thus, Qur’an was done after the death of Muhammad. But did Zayd only
“collected” and “compiled” those already written during the lifetime of
Muhammad? This is what Sahih Al-Bhukari
admitted (Sahih Al-Bhukari, together
with Sahih Al-Muslim, these two are
considered by many Muslims as semi-canonical books, these are collections of
Hadith or Islamic traditions):
“Accordingly,
I sought out the Qur’an: I gather it together from leafless palm-branches and thin
white stones and men’s breasts.” (Sahih
Al-Bhukari, Book 66, Hadith 8)
According to the testimony of
Zayd himself, when he was requested by Abu Bakr to search out the various Qur’an
and gather it together, he responded “I
sought out the Qur’an: I gather it together from leafless palm-branches and thin
white stones and men’s breasts.”
Remember that the “Qur’an” they
were referring was not the “book” called Qur’an, but “Qur’an” that recited by
Muhammad as “divine revelations” revealed to him. He seek out those “ur’an” and
what he found were those in “leafless palm-branches, thin white stones and men’s
breasts.” Divine revelation of God written in “leafless palm-branches and thin
white stones”? Are these reliable and credible? Actually great numbers came
from “men’s breasts” as we will see later.
Now, let us first see why the
sudden move of collecting the “Qur’an” that resulted in having a “standard
written Qur’an”? This is what the Islamic traditions tell us:
“Abu
Bakr sent someone to call me when Yamama people were killed. Umar was there
with him. Abu Bakr said: ‘On the day of Yamama, Umar came to me and said that
the reciters of the Qur’an were killed. He was afraid that others might be
killed elsewhere. This indicates the loss of much of the Qur’an. He suggested
that I command that the Qur’an be compiled.’ I asked Umar: ‘How would you do
something that the Prophet of Allah did not do?’ Umar kept telling me to think
about it until Allah made my heart cheerful. I took on Umar’s perspective. Abu
Bakr said to me: ‘We do not doubt that you are a wise young man. You used to write down the revelation for the
Prophet of Allah. So trace the Qur’an and compile it.’ I said: ‘By Allah, if
they had chosen me to move the mountain from its place, it would have been
easier than compiling the Qur’an. I argued: ‘How would you do something the
Prophet of Allah did not do?’ He replied: ‘By Allah, this is good!’ Therefore,
I continued compiling it from palm branched, thin stones, and the chests of
men....The leaves (suhuf) were with Abu Bakr until he died; then they were
handed down to Umar, then to Hafsah, Umar’s daughter.” (Sahih Al-Bhukari, Book 66, Hadith 8)
حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، عَنْ
إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ سَعْدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ عُبَيْدِ بْنِ
السَّبَّاقِ، أَنَّ زَيْدَ بْنَ ثَابِتٍ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ أَرْسَلَ إِلَىَّ
أَبُو بَكْرٍ مَقْتَلَ أَهْلِ الْيَمَامَةِ فَإِذَا عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ
عِنْدَهُ قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ إِنَّ عُمَرَ أَتَانِي فَقَالَ
إِنَّ الْقَتْلَ قَدِ اسْتَحَرَّ يَوْمَ الْيَمَامَةِ بِقُرَّاءِ الْقُرْآنِ
وَإِنِّي أَخْشَى أَنْ يَسْتَحِرَّ الْقَتْلُ بِالْقُرَّاءِ بِالْمَوَاطِنِ،
فَيَذْهَبَ كَثِيرٌ مِنَ الْقُرْآنِ وَإِنِّي أَرَى أَنْ تَأْمُرَ بِجَمْعِ
الْقُرْآنِ. قُلْتُ لِعُمَرَ كَيْفَ تَفْعَلُ شَيْئًا لَمْ يَفْعَلْهُ رَسُولُ
اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ عُمَرُ هَذَا وَاللَّهِ خَيْرٌ. فَلَمْ يَزَلْ
عُمَرُ يُرَاجِعُنِي حَتَّى شَرَحَ اللَّهُ صَدْرِي لِذَلِكَ، وَرَأَيْتُ فِي
ذَلِكَ الَّذِي رَأَى عُمَرُ. قَالَ زَيْدٌ قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ إِنَّكَ رَجُلٌ
شَابٌّ عَاقِلٌ لاَ نَتَّهِمُكَ، وَقَدْ كُنْتَ تَكْتُبُ الْوَحْىَ لِرَسُولِ
اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَتَتَبَّعِ الْقُرْآنَ فَاجْمَعْهُ فَوَاللَّهِ لَوْ
كَلَّفُونِي نَقْلَ جَبَلٍ مِنَ الْجِبَالِ مَا كَانَ أَثْقَلَ عَلَىَّ مِمَّا أَمَرَنِي
مِنْ جَمْعِ الْقُرْآنِ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ تَفْعَلُونَ شَيْئًا لَمْ يَفْعَلْهُ
رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ هُوَ وَاللَّهِ خَيْرٌ فَلَمْ يَزَلْ
أَبُو بَكْرٍ يُرَاجِعُنِي حَتَّى شَرَحَ اللَّهُ صَدْرِي لِلَّذِي شَرَحَ لَهُ
صَدْرَ أَبِي بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرَ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ فَتَتَبَّعْتُ الْقُرْآنَ
أَجْمَعُهُ مِنَ الْعُسُبِ وَاللِّخَافِ وَصُدُورِ الرِّجَالِ حَتَّى وَجَدْتُ
آخِرَ سُورَةِ التَّوْبَةِ مَعَ أَبِي خُزَيْمَةَ الأَنْصَارِيِّ لَمْ أَجِدْهَا
مَعَ أَحَدٍ غَيْرَهُ {لَقَدْ جَاءَكُمْ رَسُولٌ مِنْ أَنْفُسِكُمْ عَزِيزٌ
عَلَيْهِ مَا عَنِتُّمْ}
حَتَّى خَاتِمَةِ بَرَاءَةَ، فَكَانَتِ الصُّحُفُ عِنْدَ أَبِي بَكْرٍ حَتَّى
تَوَفَّاهُ اللَّهُ ثُمَّ عِنْدَ عُمَرَ حَيَاتَهُ ثُمَّ عِنْدَ حَفْصَةَ بِنْتِ
عُمَرَ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ.
Let us be reminded that the “Qur’an”
compiled by Zayd were not “written Qur’an.” The book “Qur’an” were not written
or it does not exist during the lifetime of Muhammad. If there are “revelations”
of Muhammad that were put in writing during his lifetime, very few, a small fraction.
Great numbers were found in “men’s breast” or “memorized” only in their hearts
by Muhammad’s companions and followers. As a proof, when Abu Bakr commanded
Umar to tell Zayd the task of compiling the “Qur’an”, he replied “How would you do something that the Prophet
of Allah did not do?”
When Abu Bakr said to Zayd that “We do not doubt that you are a wise young
man. You used to write down the
revelation for the Prophet of Allah. So trace the Qur’an and compile it.”
Zayd answered, “By Allah, if they had
chosen me to move the mountain from its place, it would have been easier than
compiling the Qur’an…How would you do something the Prophet of Allah did not
do?” Take note that if Zayd have been written all or many of the “revelations”
recited by Muhammad during the latter’s lifetime, he would not say such words, “if they had chosen me to move the mountain
from its place, it would have been easier than compiling the Qur’an.” Zayd
again said, “How would you do something the
Prophet of Allah did not do?” This only proves that “Qur’an was not written
and compiled during the lifetime of Muhammad.” The book called "Qur'an" does not exist
during the lifetime of Muhammad. The Qur’an was put in writing after Muhammad’s
death by a young man commissioned by Abu Bakr, named Zayd Ibn Thabit.
Why did Abu Bakr commissioned Zayd to make the book that is now called Qur’an? During the Battle of Yamama many Muslims were killed. Abu Bakr said, “‘On the day of Yamama, Umar came to me and said that the reciters of the Qur’an were killed. He was afraid that others might be killed elsewhere. This indicates the loss of much of the Qur’an.” This proves (1) many “revelations” recited to them by Muhammad were not put in writing during his lifetime but only memorized by his followers, and (2) and not all recited by Muhammad were included in the book made by Zayd (thus refuting the alleged “perfect preservation" of Muhammad’s revelations or of Qur’an).
Why did Abu Bakr commissioned Zayd to make the book that is now called Qur’an? During the Battle of Yamama many Muslims were killed. Abu Bakr said, “‘On the day of Yamama, Umar came to me and said that the reciters of the Qur’an were killed. He was afraid that others might be killed elsewhere. This indicates the loss of much of the Qur’an.” This proves (1) many “revelations” recited to them by Muhammad were not put in writing during his lifetime but only memorized by his followers, and (2) and not all recited by Muhammad were included in the book made by Zayd (thus refuting the alleged “perfect preservation" of Muhammad’s revelations or of Qur’an).
Although the Lord Jesus Christ
did not wrote any book in the Bible, however, the writers of the New Testament
books were apostles and ministers of the Gospel, like Apostle John, Apostle
Paul and Apostle Peter. Was Zayd Ibn Thabit “an apostle of Allah”? Apostle Paul
said, “Now then, we are ambassadors for
Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ's
behalf, be reconciled to God.” (II Corinthians 5:20, NKJV) Can Zayd Ibn
Thabit say the same for Muhammad?
Therefore, if the books of the
Bible were written by the prophets and the apostles themselves, the Qur’an was
not written by the prophet of Islam, not written by Muhammad himself, but only
by a young man commissioned by Abu Bakr when Muhammad was already dead. So, the
books of the Bible claimed “divine inspiration” because the writers of the book
were the divine prophets and apostles themselves. How about Qur’an? How can it
claim “divine inspiration” if it is not written by Muhammad himself but by a
young man commissioned by Abu Bakr? Was Zayd himself an inspired prophet or apostle of Allah?
Truly, there are great
differences between the Bible and Qur’an. The basis of the Bible’s divine
inspiration is greater than the basis (if they have) of the Qur’an’s divine
inspiration.
There are still many great
differences between the Qur’an and the Bible, but these are enough for now, and
these are enough to show that the Bible rises over and above the Qur'an.
Learn more about the
Iglesia Ni Cristo (Church Of Christ)
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
About the Bible
- What distinguished the Bible from human text and other scriptures? Why the Bible can rightfully claim as the only sacred scripture where the words of God are written?
- "I don't believe in the Bible because it is only written by men"? How true the Bible is the Word of God?
- The Uniqueness of the Bible. Why the Bible can rightfully claim as the "book of books"?
- The Book called the "Bible" (Physical Description of the Bible)
- Where did the word "Bible" came from?
- How the Holy Scriptures came to be called "the Bible"?
- What is the origin of the chapter and verse divisions of the Bible?
Iglesia Ni Cristo and the Bible
- We believe that the Bible is the word of God
- All the doctrines, beliefs, teachings and practices of the Iglesia Ni Cristo are written or based in the Bible
- Is the Bible an open book? The importance of God's messenger to undersatnd the words of God in the Bible
- Are members of the Iglesia Ni Cristo prohibited to read the Bible?
The Bible and Qur'an
- What are the differences between the Bible and the Qur'an?
- Who Wrote the Book called Qur'an and Who Ordered to Write It?
- Qur'an Not A Miracle At All
Copyright
Statement:
Copyright
© 2014 by THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO
ALL
RIGHTS RESERVED
No part
of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the
publisher.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Know why more and more people worldwide convert to Iglesia Ni Cristo (Church Of Christ). Learn more about this Church and find out what makes it unique.