ABOUT
EVOLUTION:
“Will a person who believes in
evolution be saved?”
A brother in faith sent us
this very timely question about evolution:
“Will a baptized
member of the INC who believes in evolution be saved?”
In Biology, one of the meaning
of the word “Evolution” is “change in the
gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation,
natural selection, and genetic drift” (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolution).
Thus, “Evolutionary process give rise to
diversity at every level of biological organisation, including the
level of species,
individual organisms,
and at the level of molecular evolution” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution).
This include the belief that “the
world is 4 billion years old, and from the primodial sea life arises from
non-living matter, thus came the simple cell; this simple cell evolved into
complex cell which evolved into fish which evolved into amphibian which evolved
into reptile which evolved into bird which evolved into mammas; and from the first
mammal came different species of mammal,hence, through evolutionary process
that took billion of years came the modern man.”
This belief contradicts the
teachings written in the Bible. The Bible exlicitly says that the Alimighty God
created all things in six days (Genesis chapter 1). Thus, when a person
believes in “evolution,” he held belief contrary to the teachings of the Holy
Scriptures.
There are people when in comes
to “origin of life” and “the origin of men,” they immediately dismiss the
teachings of the Bible as a “myth” and accepted the “evolutionary teaching” as “scientific
fact.” Is “evolutionary belief” a scientific fact?
Evolution’s “Origin of Life” is absurd
If we will only make a careful
study of Evolution’s “origin of life” we will find that their explanation about
the origin of life is absurd. The very basic foundation of Evolution’s “origin
of life” was formulated in the 19th century called “abiogenesis.”
This means that living thing came from non-living thing. They based their hypothesis
from their observation that if they will live a fruit for a day then from it
will rise maggots - abiogenesis. However, they were proven wrong. It’s
biogenesis (living things came from living things) and not abiogenesis. Maggots
found from the fruit did not came from the fruit , but from fruitflies. Today, “abiogenesis
is defined as:
“Abiogenesis…the
NOW DISCREDITED THEORY that living organisms can arise spontaneously from inanimate
matter; spontaneous generation.”
(http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Abiogenesis,
emphasis mine)
Then they fomulated another
theory, this time they made it to look “scientific.” That in the primodial sea
came the mutation of non-living matter and evolved into “living organism” (the
simple cell). There are many questions about this that evolutionists cannot
answer or cannot came up with reasonable answer. One of the major question
about this “theory” tegarding the “origin of life” that evolutions failed to
come up with a right answer is “What is the atmosphere composed of when the
natural process took place that resulted to the rise of “complex living
organism (the mutation of the non-living maters into simple cell, and the
mutation of the simple cell into complex living organism)? What was the
primodial atmosphere composed of?
Evolutionist failed to come up
with reasonable answer because of the “scientific fact” that they cannot argue.
Some evolutionists said, “For mutation to take place, a strong radiation is
needed, and for this to happen, the primodial atmosphere perhaps was composed mostly
of nitrogen.” However, if the primodial atmosphere is composed of nitrogen, mutation
would really took place because there are no ozone layer that will filter the
radiation coming from the sun. But, although mutation will yook place in
primodial atmoshepe composed mostly of nitrogen, but woluld “life” survive in an
atmosphere without “ozone layer” that filters the radiation coming from the
sun? In order for life to survive, adiation coming from the sun must be filtered,
thus we need an atmoshpere compsed mostly of oxogen. However, if the primodial
atmosphere was comosed mostly of oxygen, then the radiation was filered, thus
no mutation will took place.
Please ponder this: If the primodial atmosphere was composed mostly of
nitrogen, mutation will take place but no life will survive. If the primodial
atmosphere was composed of oxygen, life will survive but no mutation will take
place.
Thus, Evolution’s “origin of
life” is truly absurd. So, if the very beginning of the “evolutionary process”
is truly unscietific and absurd, thus how can we hold on to the remaining steps
of the “evolutionary process” as scientific? Hence, when a person believes in “evolution”
he held a false belief, a false teaching.
WILL A PERSON WHO BELIEVES IN EVOLUTION BE SAVED?
Let us go back to our brother’s
question, “Will a baptized member of the INC who believes in evolution be
saved?” Will a person who believes in evolution be saved? This is what the
Bible tells us:
Galatians 5:19-21 Bible in Basic English
”Now the works
of the flesh are clear, which are these: evil desire, unclean things, wrong use
of the senses, Worship of images, use of strange powers, hates, fighting,
desire for what another has, angry feelings, attempts to get the better of
others, divisions, FALSE TEACHINGS, Envy, uncontrolled drinking and feasting,
and such things: of which I give you word clearly, even as I did in the past, THAT
THEY WHO DO SUCH THINGS WILL HAVE NO PART IN THE KINGDOM OF GOD.” (Emphasis mine)
can you post an article about the rise of same sex marriage? thanks
ReplyDelete