ANSWERING “FALLEN ANGELS”
(“End-Time Antichrists”)
Point-by-point discussion answering those
opposing
the Church Administration
part 78
MENORCA
CROSS EXAMINED AT CA HEARING: ADMITTED NO OVERT AND DIRECT THREAT
TO HIS LIFE
His petitions for a writ of amparo and a writ of habeas corpus are in danger of being junked by the Court of Appeals
LAST October, 2015, Lowell
Menorca II filed a “writ of amparo” against the officials of the Iglesia Ni
Cristo (Church Of Christ). What is “writ of amparo”? The “writ of amparo” is a
remedy for the protection of right to life, liberty and personal security:
“The
1987 Philippine Constitution, in Article VIII, Sec.5 (5) thereof, vests the
power to the Philippine Supreme Court to "promulgate rules concerning the
protection and enforcement of constitutional rights..." This served as the
legal basis for the formulation of the Philippine writ of amparo. Features of
the Philippine Writ of Amparo
“As
can be gleaned from the definition thereof, the writ is a remedy for the
protection of right to life, liberty and personal security. It is not available
as a remedy for the protection of property right although in some cases,
property right is so intertwined with right to liberty or security thus, the
remedy can still be used. The writ can be availed of by anybody but the Rule
provides for a strict order of preference, non-compliance therewith can be
fatal to the granting of the writ by the courts....” [SOURCE:
http://www.studymode.com/essays/Philippine-Writ-Of-Amparo-Definition-And-763231.html]
Thus, for a person to be given
by the court a “writ of amparo” there must be a direct threat to his life. If
“writ of amparo” is a “a remedy for the protection of right to life, liberty
and personal security”, so how can the court give a “writ of amparo” to a
person if there is no direct threat to his life, liberty and personal security.
Last January 26, 2016, Lowell
Menorca II attended the CA hearing regarding his request for “writ of amparo.”
He was cross examined by INC lawyer, Atty. Rogelio Vinluan. In the said cross
examination, Menorca admitted the following:
“The Court of
Appeals (CA) allowed the cross examination of former Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC)
minister Lowell Menorca during the resumption of the hearing on the petition
for Writ of Amparo he filed against some leaders of the religious group.
“Cross-examined
by INC lawyer Rogelio Vinluan, Menorca told the CA that there was no overt and
direct threat to his life and those of the members of his family from church
officials.” [“CA allows cross examination of former INC minister Menorca”
Manila Bulletin online. http://www.mb.com.ph/ca-allows-cross-examination-of-former-inc-minister-menorca/]
During the cross examination,
Menorca admitted that “there was no overt and direct to his life and those of
the members of his family from church officials.” However, realizing that this weaken his position for his request of “writ of amparo”, Menorca immediately
said:
"Menorca also
said: 'We were restrained, heavily-guarded, constantly interrogated. But harm na tututukan ng kutsilyo, wala. Pero yung
wala kaming kalayaan, yun ang threat sa amin.” [Ibid.]
In response to this, the INC
lawyer pointed out to the justices of CA 7th division that there were several
instances when Menorca was able to go shopping and visit the Philippine Arena
in Bulacan.
“On the
alleged physical restraint, Vinluan pointed out to the CA several instances
when Menorca was able to go shopping and visit the Philippine Arena in Bulacan.
Photographs
of Menorca’s family inside the INC’s Central compound in Quezon City were also
shown to the CA justices. Most of the photographs showed the members of the
Menorca family smiling.” [Ibid,]
Menorca admitted that it is true he went shopping and visited the
Philippine Arena in several occasions. Also, photographs of Menorca’s family
inside the INC Central Office compound in Quezon City were shown to the
justices showing the members of the Menorca family “smiling.”
Another photo presented in the
hearing is the one that was shot during the birthday celebration of Menorca’s
wife, Jinky, where Menorca was with 21 visitors inside the compound.
The INC lawyer also shown
several requests made by Menorca’s camp while in the custody of INC, including
being allowed to watch cable television and to go to a gym.
Because he admitted
during the cross examination that there was no overt and direct threat to his
life, a reporter of Manila Times said in his news report the following:
“Petitions
for a writ of amparo and a writ of habeas corpus filed by expelled Iglesia ni
Cristo (INC or Chuch of Christ) member Lowell Menorca are in danger of being
junked by the Court of Appeals (CA).
“This loomed
after Menorca admitted in open court that there is no overt and direct threats
from church officials to physically harm him and his family.” [“Expelled
minister: No direct threats from INC” by Jomar Canlas, Manila Times Online. http://www.manilatimes.net/expelled-minister-no-direct-threats-from-inc/241726/]
Menorca was only cross
examined last January 26. He should have been subjected to cross-examination a week earlier, but while on his way to the court, he was arrested in Manila by
members of the Manila Police District by virtue of warrants of arrest issued by
courts in Marawi City and Lanao del Norte.
Thus, the result of the cross
examination of Menorca only shows that INC has nothing to do with Menorca’s
arrest and there is no truth in the allegation of Menorca’s camp that INC made
Menorca arrested last week to prevent him to attend the hearing and be cross
examined.
INC lawyers wanted Menorca to
be cross examined all along. As we have seen, during the cross examination,
Menorca admitted that there was no overt and direct threat to his life, thus “Petitions for a writ of amparo and a writ of
habeas corpus filed by expelled Iglesia ni Cristo (INC or Chuch of Christ)
member Lowell Menorca are in danger of being junked by the Court of Appeals
(CA).”
So, who benefited from the
arrest of Lowell Menorca II last week? Menorca himself, because of this his
cross examination was delayed for a week – they knew that INC lawyers were
fully prepared to grill Menorca. As we have seen, when the cross examination
was resumed, the result was not in favor of Menorca, but instead his petition for
“writ of amparo” was in danger of being junked after he admitted in open court
that there is no overt and direct threats from church officials to physically
harm him and his family.
hahahhah...yari si menorca....sinungaling kase e...writ of charo santos nlng i petition mo....hahahaha
ReplyDeleteSADYANG ANG KATOTOHANAN ANG MANANAIG HINDI ANG KASINUNGALINGANG IPINAGKAKALAT NI LOWELL...TSSSKKKK AFTER ELECTON TYAK NA DI KA NA PANSIN NG MGA KUMAKAMPI SA U KAHIT ABSCBN ...
ReplyDeleteSa ibang araw iba na naman sasabihin nyan. Nahuhuli sa sariling bibig mahusay magtali tali ng kasinungalingan. Bakit kaya sabik ito pag usapan sa media? Nag artista nlang sana. Tumigil na kayo mga kampon ng kadiliman Menorca aka Antonio Ebanghelista et al.
ReplyDelete