Fallen Angels response to our challenge is all but "palusot" to get away from our challenge!

“FALLEN ANGELS” RESPONSE TO OUR CHALLENGE:

SINCERE OR JUST BLUFFING (ONLY MAKING THEIR WAY OUT OF THE SITUATION)

MASABI LANG NA MAY SAGOT SILA SA HAMON PERO ANG TOTOO AY “NAGPAPALUSOT LANG TALAGA”

 HOW DO YOU KNOW IF A PERSON IS READY TO FACE YOU IN A DEBATE AND HE IS NOT JUST BLUFFING? HE WILL FIRST FORMALLY ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE THEN BOTH PARTIES WILL TALK REGARDING THE “CONDITIONS” AND “RULES”. IF THE OTHER PARTY GAVE HIS “CONDITIONS” WITHOUT FIRST FORMALLY ACCEPTING THE CHALLENGE, THEN THIS PERSON IS ONLY “BLUFFING” OBECAUSE HE IS ONLY MAKING A WAY TO GET OUT OF THE SITUATION.

This is the reason why before the debate, there’s the PRE-DABATE CONRENCE. And remember that this pre-debate conference will be held after the other party accepted the challenge of the other party. Even in sports, before the two parties sat down and negotiate the conditions, the other party must first accept the challenge. So, the other party has no right to bring out his condition/s counter to the conditions brought out by the party making the challenge, if HE HAS NOT YET FORMALLY ACCEPTED THE CHALLENGE!

BUT NOT TO THE “NAUTOERS” OF THE FALLEN ANGELS! It seems that they don’t know a thing when it comes to the procedures of debate.

Take for example this person calling himself “William Smith.” He lay downed his conditions BUT DID NOT YET EXPLICITLY AND FORMALLY ACCEPTED THE CHALLENGE. OUR CHALLENGE IS VERY SIMPLE JUST AS WHAT WE SAID IN OUR POST:

“We want your confirmations in accepting this challenge. Please post in your accounts this statement if you really accept our challenge (not only you Benito Affleck, but all the rest of you so-called “dfenders” or should I say “nautoers”):

“I accept the challenge that if they presented a pertinent documents proving that Angel and Marc are those behind the Schutzengel Telecom I will admit that all our accusations againt the CHURCH ADMINISTRATION are lies, and I will make a public apology posted in my own account to the CHURCH, TO THE SANGGUNIAN, AND ESPECIALLY TO BROTHER EDUARDO V. MANALO, and after three days when I posted my public apology, I will deactive or delete my account/s, blog/s and website/s.”

BUT, DID WILLIAM SMITH MADE THIS CONFIRMATION THAT HE IS ACCEPTING THE CHALLENGE? NO! HE MUST FIRST MAKE THE CONFIRMATION WE ARE DEMANDING, THEN WE TALK ON HIS TERMS.

So, is Mr. “William Smith” sincere in acepting the challenge or he is just “bluffing” and making “palusot” just to get away from the situation?

This is also what we saw in other “nautoers” of the Fallen Angels – they did not formally accepted the challenge, but only making “palusot” or making way out of the situation. Di ba Sher Lock, Shyla, and Benito?