AE Remember This: Did Ka Rolan Esguerra Bought a brand new High-end Ford Car as claim by AE?

 AE…REMEMBER ME?

(HOW PRISTINE TRUTH PUT YOU IN BIG SHAME)

PART 17

Mula noong Abril 1, 2016 ay inire-repost po namin ang mga naging sagutan nina “Antonio Ebangelista” at “Pristine Truth” noong 2015 upang ipaala-ala kay AE, at sa kaniyang mga napapaniwala, at upang malaman ng madla na noon pa ay sinagot na si AE sa kaniyang mga paratang laban sa Iglesia at KUNG PAPAANO SIYA NALAGAY SA MALAKING KAHIHIYAN.

AE, REMEMBER THIS

Noong una ang "target" nila Antonio Ebangelista na "pasamain" ay ang mga miembro ng Sanggunian upang patunayan na may kurapsiyon daw ngayon sa Iglesia Ni Cristo. Ngunit, mukhang ngayon ay iniwan na nila ang kanilang "hakbanging" ito sapagkat isang katotohanan na WALA naman talaga silang maipakitang konkretong ebidensiya, bagkus ay sila ang napapahiya sa mga diumano'y ebidensiya na kanilang ipinakikita tulad ng tinatalakay natin sa artikulong ito. 

EVERYTHING YOU SAID ARE

ALREADY ANSWERED!

WHY NOT FOCUS ON REFUTING

OUR ANSWERS AND STOP YOUR FUTILE

REDUNDANT ENUMERATION OF

YOUR ALLEGATIONS?

WHEN someone alerted Antonio Ebangelista that their articles against the Church Administration are answered one-by-one by this blog, this is what he replied:

Abby VidaSumagot po sila sa expose nyong ito thru ‘The Iglesia Ni Cristo' [They responded your expose thru 'The Iglesia Ni Cristo']

June 20 at 6:36pm

Iglesia Ni Cristo Silent No More By Antonio Ebangelista Opo. Updated po kami sa mga sagit (sic) nila sa lahat ng sites nila… [Yes. We are updated about their answers in all their sites…]

June 20 at 7:23pm

So, Antonio Ebangelista himself said that he is "updated" about our responses on his articles attacking and maligning the CHURCH ADMINISTRATION. Actually, their latest article entitled “PHP 3.5 MILLION BOUGHT BRAND NEW BMW 3200 SERIES” (June 23, 2015), is a “hostile” reaction against our article entitled “OPEN CHALLENGE? SINO BA TALAGA ANG TUNAY NA HINDI SUMASAGOT O TUMUTUGON?” ["OPEN CHALLENGE? WHI'S IS TRULY NOT RESPONDING?"] posted in our blogsite last June 20, 2015. In this article of ours, we listed all their articles against the CHURCH ADMINISTRATION and also listed our corresponding answers, and this SHOWED that Antonio Ebangelista never responded to our answers, thus proving that they are LYING in saying “their allegations are never answered.”

What he did in his latest article was enumerating again the old allegations which we already answered as if these are never tackled by us. He wanted to make his readers believe that we have not answer his allegations against the Church Administration.

In his latest article, Antonio Ebangelista wanted to convinced his readers that he is the one who is telling the truth and we are the one who are lying or covering the truth. To further guve “drama” on his allegation, this is what he said:

“But if we love our Executive Minister, if we have a genuine concern for the Church, if we value our true salvation, then FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHT TO KNOW THE TRUTH AND STAND FOR THE TRUTH NO MATTER WHAT PERSECUTION WE MIGHT FACE, NO MATTER WHAT THREATS THEY THROW AT US. THIS IS THE GREATEST TEST OF OUR FAITH. THIS IS THE GREATEST TEST OF THE CHURCH. THIS IS THE UNSTOPPABLE CLEANSING PROCESS IN ORDER TO SEPARATE THE WORTHY FROM THE UNWORTHY OF SALVATION.”

SO, LET US AGAIN EXAMINE IF WHO IS SAYING THE TRUTHAND WHO IS LYING

Please ready your scoreboard!

(1) Antonio Ebanghelista said:

“I hope sooner or later The Sanggunian, or even their opinionated alter-ego (www.theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com) will have an answer regarding the unexplained ability of the Sanggunian members to  own high-end vehicles:”

Those opposing the Church Administration making his readers believe that the Sanggunian is behind the THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO blog. He further claims:

“Put your money where your mouth is. Ask your bosses, since they are way up there in the Sanggunian, they have all the records you need Mr. Blogspotter, ask them to show you…”

THE TRUTH

The thousands of netizens who liked THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO Facebook page are our witnesses that this page ALREADY EXISTED YWO YEARS BEFORE Antonio Ebangelista's blog. Our more than 100,000+ strong followers of this blog are our witnesses that this blog existed long before your “infamous” blog. Thus, THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO blog is not created by the Sanggunian just recently to counter you as what you claim.

To further prove that Antonio Ebangelista’s allegation against THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO blog is a big lie, we all know that this blog and FB page was created by PRISTINE TRUTH last 2013. Our “followers” attest that since creation of the THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO blog we are answering the allegations and attacks of the enemies of the faith against the CHURCH and the CHURCH ADMINISTRATION. To see our main objectives, click this link:

“ABOUT THIS SITE” http://theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/p/about-this-site.html

To further prove that the Sanggunian has nothing to do with the creation of this blog and it is true that since the creation of this blog we are answering the attacks of the enemies of the faith against the Church, Brother Felix Y. Manalo, Brother Erano G. Manalo and Brother Eduardo V. Manalo, see our section entitled “BLOG ARCHIVE” (at the lower right side of this blogsite). Here you can see that we already published 392 articles, including this one.

Even the Catholic Faith Defenders, ADDs, CONLEY, and others can attest to the truth of what we said that THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO existed two years before Antonio Ebanghelista, and since then we are defending the Church and the Church Administration from the enemies of our faith. Actually, what we did not expect is the coming of the “time” when we will defend the CHURCH and the CHURCH ADMINISTRATION from those calling themselves “kapatid.” I remember the “Kerethites” who defended King David against the Philistine, the Ammorites and the Aramaeans. They did not expect the coming of the “time” that they will defend the King from his own KINS.  

Thus, Antonio Ebanghelista’s claim that THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO is working for the Sanggunian is indeed a BIG LIE. The TRUTH is that members of the Sanggunian don’t even know that this blog (THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO blog) exists and they know nothing about PRISTINE TRUTH.

WHO’S TELLING THE TRUTH?

TRUTH SCOREBOARD

Score ONE for US, and ZERO for AE

(2) Antonio Ebanghelista said:

“I hope sooner or later The Sanggunian, or even their opinionated alter-ego (www.theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com) will have an answer regarding the unexplained ability of the Sanggunian members to  own high-end vehicles:”

He said this June 23, 2015. Last June 20, 2015 at 7:23pm he said in his page “Opo. Updated po kami sa mga sagit (sic) nila sa lahat ng sites nila… [Yes. We are updated about their answers in all their sites…].” So, Antonio Ebanghelista cannot deny that he knows we already answered this allegation. See our article, “THE UNEXPLAINED WEALTH? Bakit pagkalipas ng isang panahon ay wala pa rin silang nailabas na konkretong ebidensiya?” [THE UNEXPLAINED WEALTH? Why after a few time they still failed to bring out concrete evidences] posted on June 5, 2015. Click this link to see this article:

http://theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-unexplained-wealth-ng-mga-miembro.html

This article was published exactly one month since Antonio Ebangelista published his article entitled, “HOW TO EXPLAIN AN UNEXPLAINED WEALTH – PART 1” (May 5, 2015). In this article of Antonio Ebanghelista, he made a challenge that although the Sangunian members will hide all their bank accounts, dummy accounts, mansion, condos, online accounts, money trails, paper trails, HE IS GOING TO EXPOSE IT ALL.

So, we gave him enough time to fulfill his “promise” that he is going to expose it all. One month came no bank accounts, dummy accounts, mansion, condos, online accounts, money trails, paper trails. This is what we exposed in our article “THE UNEXPLAINED WEALTH? Bakit pagkalipas ng isang panahon ay wala pa rin silang nailabas na konkretong ebidensiya?”.

Also in this article of ours, we exposed the truth that not only he failed to show Sanggunian's bank accounts, dummy accounts, mansion, condos, online accounts, money trails, paper trails, but that the only evidence of the alleged “unexplained wealth” of the members of the Sanggunian he showed are pictures of cars.

Thus, Antonio Ebangelista is lying when he claimed in his latest article that we still have no answer or we haven’t answered his allegation.

WHO’S TELLING THE TRUTH?

TRUTH SCOREBOARD

Score TWO for US, and ZERO for AE

(3) Antonio Ebanghelista said:

“I hope sooner or later The Sanggunian, or even their opinionated alter-ego (www.theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com) will have an answer regarding the unexplained ability of the Sanggunian members to  own high-end vehicles:

“For example, Ka Radel G. Cortez’ Php 3.8Million Bought-Brand New White ToyotaPrado… Or Ka Eraño “Erdz” Codera’s Php 2.5 Million Bought-Brand New Titanium Silver Hyundai Sta. Fe… And these are all with documentary proof of their ownership, which the brethren can easily verify with LTO (Land Transportation Office). That’s probably why the Sanggunian is silent about it, simply because they can not answer it without revealing the truth…. THAT IT IS ACTUALLY TRUE. But I still invite theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com to provide counter evidences to disprove this, and when I say counter-evidence, it doesn’t mean the act of copy-pasting my article and inserting your beating-around-the-bush-opinions without even an inkling of a proof, which pretty much describes your way of writing in your blogs.”

Before I tackle this issue, I have a very simple question: “What is one of the most effective way to prove that a person is lying?” THROUGH HIS OWN WORDS.

Have you notice what Antonio Ebangelista said, “I still invite theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com to provide counter evidences to disprove this, and when I say counter-evidence, it doesn’t mean the act of copy-pasting my article…” Does this mean that Antonio Ebangelista is afraid of his own words? Why is he afraid of using his own words against him?

 Is a person’s statement cannot be used as an evidence against him? When policemen arrest a person, the law states that his right be stated to him, “You have the right to remain silent BECAUSE EVERYTHING YOU SAY CAN BE USED AGAINST YOU.” So, WHY IS ANTONIO EBANGELISTA SO AFRAID OF US COPY-PASTING HIS WORDS FROM  HIS OWN ARTICLES? BECAUSE HE KNEW THAT HE HAVE STATEMENTS FROM HIS ARTICLES THAT CAN BE USED AGAINST HIM! From his article  “HOW TO EXPLAIN AN UNEXPLAINED WEALTH – PART 1” (he published in his blog last May 5, 2015) this is what he said (THIS IS WHAT HE IS AFRAID OF):

“…tiayakin na nakaready na ang mga deed of sale ng mga di-umanoy mga bahay na binili ninyo sa murang halaga lamang o kaya ay mga mamahaling high-end na sasakyan sa murang halaga lamang…” […make sure he deed of sale of the houses you bought that worth less are ready or of the luxury cars which brought much lower with the usual price…]

SO THIS IS THE REASON WHY ANTONIO EBANGELISTA IS SO AFRAID THAT WE COPY-PASTE HIS OWN WORDS FROM ONE OF HIS ARTICLES. HE KNEW THAT THERE ARE INDEED STATEMENTS THAT HE WROTE THAT CAN BE USED AGAINST HIM!

In his latest article, he claims that we have no answer on how Ka Radel managed to own a “prada” and Ka Erdz to own a “sta. fe.” Take note of his trickery, he mentioned the “price” of the “prada” (he claimed that a “brand new” one cost 3.8 miliion pesos), and he also mentioned the price of “sta. fe” (he claimed that a “brand new” one cost 2.5 million pesos). What he mentioned are the costs of these cars if they are “brand new.”

HOWEVER, THE PROOF THAT ANTONIO EBANGELISTA IS LYING IN SAYING THAT “THERE ARE NO ANSWER ON HOW THEY ACQUIRED THOSE CARS” IS HIS OWN WORDS. The reason why he is so afraid that we copy paste his own words because he knew that he is lying and that he himself answered how these cars have been acquired. ANTONIO EBANGHELISTA SAID, “…make sure he deed of sale of the houses you bought that worth less are ready or of THE LUXURY CARS WHICH BROUGHT MUCH LOWER WITH THE USUAL PRICE…”

Antonio Ebangelista refuted by Antonio Ebanghelista. So, now we know why he said, “I still invite theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com to provide counter evidences to disprove this, and WHEN I SAY COUNTER-EVIDENCE, IT DOESN’T MEAN THE ACT OF COPY-PASTING MY ARTICLE…”

WHO’S TELLING THE TRUTH?

TRUTH SCOREBOARD

Score THREE for US, and ZERO for AE

(4) Antonio Ebanghelista said:

 “So to whom is this Bought-Brand New BMW 3 series blue rider, which is parked everyday at Bro. Rolando A. Esguerra’s residence and frequently used for his official and unofficial travels, registered to? Take note at the Plate Number, let’s ask another AE correspondent from LTO Main Office to provide us their database entry for this Plate Number WOW-809”

Antonio Ebanghelista accused “Tata Rolan” (Ka Rolan Esguerra) as owning a “BRAND NEW BMW 3 series blue rider.” How did he prove that Ka Rolan owns a “BRAND NEW BMW 3 series blue rider”?

First, he took a picture of the car while parked at Ka Rolan’s garage. Here’s the picture he took:

 Image 01

Second, he post a copy of the registration of this car:

Image 02

Third, he post pictures of BMW F30 3 Series sixth generation, a high-end luxury car indeed:

Image 03

Then he accused Ka Rolan of attaining such high-end luxury car through corrupt practices:

“Yet, some members of the Sanggunian are probably more clever than the others. This particular Sanggunian member doesn’t register his high-end vehicles under his own name, or atleast not all of his cars, that’s what close-associates (Dummies) are for. He has a knack for acquiring the latest and grandest vehicles, and most of the time, he will buy the vehicle, have a deed of sale, BUT the change of ownership will not yet be transferred so it will not reflect him as the actual owner. This tactful procedure also goes the same way if the property (high end vehicle in this case) is given to the Sanggunian as a “gift” for a favor (Project Referral or Successfully acquired government project), but for security reasons, the registration will remain with the previous owner or buyer. This is their favorite “absolute deniability” excuse…”

EXAMINATION OF EXHIBIT A

Let us examine his evidences. The registration of the car doesn’t say it’s a BMW F30 3 Series sixth generation, but a BMW 3200 series. Let us see again the registration of the car:

Image 04

Wow! A high-end luxury car BMW F30 3 Series sixth generation running on diesel? The registration clearly says, “BMW 3200 sedan diesel car.” Ebangelista might contend, “it’s the same! “BMW F30 3 Series sixth generation” and “BMW 3200 sedan running on diesel” are one and the same.” Facts don’t agree with you Antonio Ebangelista:

http://www.cheap-bmw-parts.com/bmw-3200/

  Image 05

This site clearly shows that BMW 3 series is different from BMW 3200 series. Maybe, to escape from the quicksand of shame, Antonio Ebangelista will argue that “It’s a BMW. Although it’s not BMW F30 3 Series, but it’s a BMW, so it’s a high-end luxury car! All BMWs are high-end luxury cars!” Owssss. Is that a fact or just a “palusot”? This news from USA Today published in the year 2012 proves that BMW released low-end luxury cars:

“Flood of low-end luxury cars aims to batter BMW 3 Series”

By James R. Healey, USA TODAY

February 21, 2012

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/driveon/post/2012/02/new-entry-luxury-cars-small-price-mpg-low-end-fight-bmw-3-series/1#.VYmx41JgjrM

So, Antonio Ebanghelista is lying in saying that Ka Rolan owns a BMW 3 Series. Wow, another point for us and still zero for A.E.

WHO’S TELLING THE TRUTH?

TRUTH SCOREBOARD

Score FOUR for US, and ZERO for AE

But, wait! We are not yet finish. Antonio Ebangelista said it’s a “brand new car.” Again, “What is one of the most effective way of proving a person is lying?” Yes, all of you are right. Through his own words. Antonio Ebangelista said it’s a brand new car, but this is also what he said in the same article:

“Registered as the original buyer/owner: JESSIE L. MENDOZA. You can ask him for any further questions you may have regarding this shady BMW which Ka RAE is using and is still registered under his name.”

If a car has an original owner, and you are not the first owner or not the original owner, then the car you bought is a second-hand car!!! Antonio Ebangelista said, it’s a brand new car, and he also attests that there is an original owner, not Ka Roalan, so it’s a brand new second-hand car? LOL. So, another points for us, and still zero for AE.

WHO’S TELLING THE TRUTH?

TRUTH SCOREBOARD

Score FIVE for US, and ZERO for AE

Wait! Wait! Wait! That's not all! Antonio Ebangelista accused Ka Rolan of attaining it through corrupt practices. He said,  “He has a knack for acquiring the latest and grandest vehicles, and most of the time, he will buy the vehicle, have a deed of sale, BUT the change of ownership will not yet be transferred so it will not reflect him as the actual owner. This tactful procedure also goes the same way if the property (high end vehicle in this case) is given to the Sanggunian as a “gift” for a favor (Project Referral or Successfully acquired government project), but for security reasons, the registration will remain with the previous owner or buyer. This is their favorite “absolute deniability” excuse…”

I managed to tracked the car dealer from whom Ka Rolan bought this car. His name is BOBET COLLANTES. He is a second-hand car dealer, and this is what he said, “Second-hand lang iyan kaya nga nakapangalan pa ang registration sa iba. Iyon ang unang may-ari, kaya nga second-hand lang. Siempre Ka Rolan iyan kaya ibinenta ko lang sa kaniya ng mura. Low-end lang iyan. Mas mahal pa nga ang Toyota Altis diyan!”

Let go back to the scoreboard:

WHO’S TELLING THE TRUTH?

TRUTH SCOREBOARD

Score SIX for US, and ZERO for AE

Again, to make his readers believe that there are corruptions inside the Church today, he again mentioned many of his allegations as if no answers were already given to them. Pauli-ulit lang ang kanilang mga alegasyon o paratang at pinalalabas lang nila na hindi pa nasasagot ang mga ito para lamag papaniwalain ang mga tao na mayroon ngang malaking pagbabago at katiwalian na nagaganap ngayon sa Iglesia.

He again mentioned the buying of the Scenic property in South Dakota as a proof of the existence of corruptions and anomalies inside the Church. However, this issue was already answered, and Antonio Ebangelista never responded nor made any move to refute our answer. See “THE TRUTH ABOUT THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO’S SCENIC, SOUTH DAKOTA”

http://theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-truth-about-scenic-south-dakota.html

He again point to Fort Victoria as proof of the Church going into commercial ventures. But, this too was already cleared. He again mentioned the “alegationbs” but he always failed in refuting our response or answer in this allegation. See “THE FORT VICTORIA ANOMALY?”

http://theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/2015/06/fort-victoria-anomaly-answering-fort.html

He also mentioned the “selling of the prime properties,” but we already answered this. See “SOME PROPERTIES OF THE CHURCH ARE SOLD! SO WHAT?”

http://theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/2015/06/is-property-being-sold-proof-of.html

And everytime he featured “prime properties” that have been sold, his evidences only confirm what we are saying is true and that they are wrong. See “THANK YOU AE FOR CONFIRMING WHAT WE SAY IS TRUE: Answering the Tagaytay Property Issue”

http://theiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/2015/06/evidences-shown-by-those-opposing.html

THUS, EVERYTHING ANTONIO EBANGHELISTA SAID ARE

ALREADY ANSWERED!

SO, WHY NOT FOCUS ON REFUTING

OUR ANSWERS AND STOP YOUR FUTILE

REDUNDANT ENUMERATION OF

YOUR ALLEGATIONS?

Ang itinuturo sa mga ministro at manggagawa mula pa sa panahon ni Kapatid na Felix Y. Manalo at Kapatid na Erano G. Manalo, hanggang sa kasalukuyang Pamamahala ay ang maging huwaran sa “malinis na pamumuhay.” Ang pagkakaroon ng “material na bagay” tulad ng sasakyan, sariling bahay at iba ay hindi ipinagbabawal sa mga ministro at manggagawa. Hindi kailanman mababasa sa ministerial ethics na bawal na magkaroon ng mga ito, at hindi kailanman itinuro na dungis sa ministerio ang magkaroon ng mga ito. Hindi ipinagbabawal at hindi masama na magtamo ng ganitong mga bagay kailanma’t sa mabuti at legal na paraan tulad sa pamamagitan na pinag-ipunan, tinulungan ng mga kamag-anak o mahal sa buhay, o kaya naman ay sa pamamagitan ng “financing” (kung hindi naman ito makabibigat sa isang manggagawa).

Ang Panginoong Diyos ay naglalaan ng biyaya at pagpapala sa Kaniyang bayan. Sa pagpapala Niya sa Kaniyang bayan ay hindi ba mararamay dito ang mga nangangasiwa sa Kaniyang bayan. Kung pinagpapala ng Panginoong Diyos ang mga kapatid, ang mga maytungkulin, hindi rin ba Niya pagpapalain ang mga nangangasiwa sa Kaniyang bayan? Isang hayag na katotohanan na pinadadaloy ng Diyos ang biyaya sa isang ministro o manggagawa sa pamamagitan na ang pinagpapala Niya ay ang kanilang mga magulang, mga kapatid, mga anak, mga kamag-anak, mga malalapit sa kanila. Gaya nga ng sinasabi ng matatandang ministro, “Kahit hindi mo hangarin, kung kailangan mo o kaya’y ginusto ng Diyos na ibigay sa iyo ay darating at darating iyan sa iyo.”

Totoong masama ang pagmomolestiya kapuwa sa kapatid at sa pulitiko. Subalit, kung mayroon mang gumagawa nito, hindi pa rin ito repleksiyon o salamin ng kabuuan ng Iglesia at ng ministerio. Ang kasalanang “pagmomolestiya” ay isang “personal na kasalanan” na tulad ng kasalanan na nagawa ni Judas Iscariote. Ang kasalanan ni Judas ay hindi kasalanan ng buong Iglesia. Kung nagkasala man si Judas at alam natin na siya’y isang ministro, isang apostol, subalit hindi nangangahulugan na madungis na ang ministerio at nagbago na ang Iglesia na napuno na ng katiwalian. Kung nagkasala man si Judas, Ananias, Safira, Himeneo at Alejandro, hindi ang ibig sabihin ay “maruming-marumi” na ang Iglesia. Nagkaroon man ng Judas, Ananias, Safira, Himeneo at Alejandro, subalit nananatili pa rin na ang Iglesia ay banal, malinis at maliligtas. Samakatuwid, ang Iglesia ay nananatiling dalisay, malinis at nasa uring maliligtas. Kung may indibiduwal man na gunagawa ng mali, ang Diyos ang maghahayag at magpaparusa sa kaniya.

Ang Pamamahala ang kinakasangkapan ng Diyos sa paghahanda sa Iglesia sa pagsalubong sa Ikalawang Pagparito ni Cristo sa pagdating ng araw ng ating kaligtasan. Ang mga kumakalaban sa Pamamahala ay hindi sa ikalilinis ng Iglesia, kundi pagtatangka na pagsira sa Iglesia. Hindi ba nakasisira sa Iglesia ang ginagawa nila? At alam natin kung sino ang may tunay na hangarin na ang Iglesia ay masira.

Kaninong panig kayo mga kapatid?

PRISTINE TRUTH