HE DID IT
AGAIN!
CONFIRMING
WHAT
WE SAY IS
TRUE
SCORE THREE
FOR US AND ZERO FOR AE
Answering
the Roxas Boulevard
Property
Issue
IN his futile attempt to
prove that there are now anomalies and corruption inside the Church, Antonio
Ebanghelista continously posting articles regarding prime properties of the
Church being sold. We already answered his past articles regarding this issue:
AE’s
article: “introduction: Prime INC Properties that are for sale?”
OUR ANSWER: “SOME
PROPERTIES OF THE CHURCH ARE SOLD! SO WHAT?”
AE’s
article: INC Prime Properties Sold: Part I (The Tagaytay property Issue)”
OUR ANSWER: “THANK
YOU AE FOR CONFIRMING WHAT WE SAY IS TRUE”
ANSWERING
THE TAGAYTAY PROPERTY ISSUE
AE’s
article: INC Prime Properties Sold: Part 2 (The Ugong property Issue)”
OUR ANSWER: “SCORE
TWO FOR US AND ZERO FOR AE”
ANSWERING
THE UGONG PROPERTY ISSUE
However, in his articles
featuring the sold prime properties of the Church, the only thing that he
managed to do is showing documents that these properties were already sold, but IN ALL
HIS ARTICLES REGARDING THIS ISSUE HE FAILED TO ANSWER AND INSTEAD CONFIRMED THESE FOLLOWING POINTS:
(1) Selling
properties is not an anomaly because the Church Administration has the authority and all the legal rights do so.
“Section
164. Such corporations shall have the right to purchase, hold, mortgage, or
sell real estate for its church...” (The Corporation Law of the Philippines,
Section 164.)
He always avoid
to tackle this point of ours in his articles regarding the Tagaytay property issue
and the the Ugong property issue. He ahain avoided to tackle this issue in his
latest article discussing the Roxas Boulevard property issue. He continuously avoiding
this issue because he knows he can’t refute this point. THIS IS A FACT THAT HE
CAN’T ARGUE.
(2) No locale, district, ot any department of the
Church, not even the Executive Minister using these sold properties, thus
these properties are in the state of “no loner needed by the Church” or “the Church
has no longer use for it.”
Antonio
Ebangelista himself confirmed that the Tagaygay property is “no longer needed”
by the Church:
“Let’s see
if you can recognize this once-a-tranquil-haven for Ka Eraño G. Manalo and his
whole Family, now a ghost town of useless abandonment.” [Antonio Ebangelista, “INCProperties
Sold: Part 1” June 12, 2015]
The Ugong
property was the former location of the INC Radio transmitter tower, but in
1995 the radio transmitter tower was transfered to Ubando, Bulacan, and Ugong
locale has already a House of Worship built in a nearby property. Thus, the
Church has no longer use for this property.
In his latest
article, Antonio Ebangelista failed to prove that the Roxas property is
currently use by a locale, a district or a Church’s department.
Thus, AGAIN,
Antonio Ebangelista failed to refute our point that these sold properties
are no longer needed or the Church has no longer use for them, that no locale,
no district , no Church’s department is using these properties.
(3)
The Church Administration has all the legal rights to sell or dispose
properties, more so those properties the Church ‘has no longer use for it” or “no
longer needed.”
In failing to
disprove our point that the Church Administration has all the legal rights or
authority to sell or dispose properties no longer use or the Church has no need
for it, and in failing to refute our argument that no locale, district, or
Church’s department is using these properties being sold, thus, HE FAILED BLATANTLY TO PROVE THAT THERE IS
ANOMALY OCCURRED IN SELLING THOSE PROPERTIES.
(4) There are expenses in
maintaining such properties including the taxes and upkeep. Not a small amount
of money is use for the expenses in maintaining such properties. As what we
said, “Saan kukunin ang malaking gastos sa pagbabayad sa malaking halagang
gugulin sa taxes ng mga properties na ito at sa maintenance at securities ng
mga ito? Sa abuloy ng mga kapatid? Kaya, lumalabas na para kay Antonio
Ebanghelista ay mali na ibenta ang mga properties na ito, at tama na
panatilihin ito kahit gumugol ng malaki sa pananatili ng mga ito na kukunin sa
abuloy ng Iglesia.”
In his
article about the Ugong property issue, he made a futile attempt to answer this
point. He argues that “we should not worry about the expenses for maintaining these
properties.” BUT HE FAILED TO ANSWER WHY WE SHOULD NOT WORRY ABOUT THE EXPENSES
FOR MAINTAINING THESE PROPERTIES. I am waiting for him to say that we should
not worry about the expenses for maintaining these properties because he is
willing to shoulder all the expenses. WHY HE DID NOT VOLUNTEER TO SHOULDER
ALL THE EXPENSES? Because he himself knew that large amount of money is needed
for maintaining these properties because as he himself attested, these are “PRIME” properties. Regarding the Ugong property this is
what he said:
“Wait a
minute… this can’t possibly be right… Why would the Sanggunian approve the sale
of a COMPLETELY USABLE, PRIME LOT, STRATEGICALLY LOCATED IN ONE OF THE
HIGH-VALUED LOCATIONS IN THE METRO?”
Regarding the
Roxas Boulevard property, this is what he attested:
“RIGHT
ACROSS “CITY OF DREAMS MANILA” MAKING IT A HIGH VALUE PROPERTY IN A HIGHLY
VIABLE LOCATION”
So, Brethren,
next time Antonio Ebangelista insists that these properties should not be
sold, ASK HIM IF HE WILL SHOULDER ALL THE EXPENSES FOR MAINTAINING THOSE PRIME
PROPERTIES? [Sa susunod na magpilit si Antonio Ebanghelista na hindi dapat
ibenta ang mga propetrties na ito, itanong natin sa kaniya na kung handa ba siya
na balikatin ang lahat ng gagastusin sa pagpapanatili sa mga prime properties
na ito?]
(5)
Disposing properties no longer needed or we have no use for it and instead we spend
large amount of money in maintaining it is not only being practical, but also
being truly efficient in managing the finances of the Church.
Disposing
these prime properties which the Church no longer needed or no use for them, is
not “mismanagement” but a proof of being efficient in managing the finances of
the Church. [Ano ang tawag doon sa isang tao na pinananatili ang isang property
na malaki ang nagugol na gastos o kumakain ng malaki sa budget ng pamilya
subalit wala namang gamit, hindi ginagamit, hindi pinakikinabangan?]
In failing to
prove that these properties is still needed by a locale, a district, or a
Church’s department, is also failing to prove that the Church Administration
is committing a “mismanagement “ of the finances of the Church.
Which is
practical and which is not? Which is being efficient and which is not?
Maintaining properties although we spend large amount of money in maintaining
it but the Church has no use for it, or disposing properties to avoid the
expenses in maintaining it because that Church has no longer use for it?
Establishing in the future a house of worship on this property in Roxas
Boulevard? Are you serious?
In his latest
article featuring the Roxas Boulevard property, this is what he said:
“Before,
the Church administration with its forward visionary stance, would acquire
properties, even if we don’t have a use for it yet, because they know that the
day will come when the church will need it in its vast expansion and
activities, and the price it will have to pay along with the cost of
maintaining it, is negligible compared to the amount needed to buy the
property many years after when it is finally needed, thus saving the church a
lot of money for other uses.”
WELL, “…the Church
Administration…would acquire properties, even if we don’t have a use for it
yet, because they know that the day will come when the church will need it in
its vast expansion and activities, and the price it will have to pay along with
the cost of maintaining it, is negligible compared to the amount needed to
buy the property many years after when it is finally needed” THIS IS TRUE BUT CERTAINLY
NOT TO THE ROXAS BOULEVARD PROPERTY.
Is Antonio
Ebangelista saying that the Roxas Boulevard property is a future site for a
House of Worship? Only a half-wit, braindead, stupid, moron will say that. Why?
This is what Antonio Ebangelista himself testified regarding the Roxas
Boulevard property:
“RIGHT
ACROSS “CITY OF DREAMS MANILA” MAKING IT A HIGH VALUE PROPERTY IN A HIGHLY
VIABLE LOCATION”
Image
01
Building a
House of Worship right across “CITY OF DREAMS MANILA”? Why only a half-wit, braindead,
stupid, moron will say that? What is “City of Dreams Manila”?
“City of Dreams
Manila is an integrated RESORT AND CASINO LOCATED AT THE HEART OF ENTERTAINMENT
CITY. The resort features 3 luxurious hotel brands that rival other five-star
hotels in Metro Manila. It is strategically positioned and very near Ninoy
Aquino International Airport, SM Mall of Asia Complex, SMX Convention Center
and other key destinations.” [http://www.cityofdreams.com.ph/]
Image
02
Image
03
Image
04
A House of Worship just across a resort and
casino, strategically positioned and very near SM Mall of Asia Complex, and
other casinos and bars, and at the heart of the entertainment city? Antonio
Ebangelista, are you serious?
I’m sure now
you agree that only a half-wit, braindead, stupid, moron will say that the
Roxas Boulevard property is a suitable future
site for a House of Worship.
WHAT THESE DOCUMENTS REALLY SAY?
The documents that Antonio
Ebangelista published in his articles regarding “INC prime properties being
sold” only prove that these property is already been sold, nothing more.
Are they evidences that there
are now anomalies and corruption inside the Church? Anomaly is a deviation from
the norm, the rules, regulation and law. Corruption is “moral perversion and
dishonest proceedings.” The Church Administration has all the legal rights and
authority to dispose (sell) properties especially those no longer needed. No
locale, district or department is using them. There are large expenses in
maintaining them. The Church no longer needed them. Thus, where’s the anomaly
and corruption in selling these properties?
Therefore, in view of these
facts, Antonio Ebangelista and the people behind him are only deceiving the
people when they posted these documents and saying that these prove that there are
now anomalies and corruption inside the Church.
To Antonio Ebanghelista and the people
behind him, remember this:
ANG MGA TUNAY NA KAPATID
AY GALIT NA GALIT SA KATIWALIAN,
SUBALIT LALO KAMING GALIT
WITH THE INFORMATION, EVIDENCES, AND PROOFS PRESENTED IN THIS BLOG, THE ULTERIOR MOTIVE OF AE’S GROUP IS CRYSTAL CLEAR:
ReplyDelete To rally the brethren against the so-called corruptions of Sanggunian members then,
Accused the Executive Minister of not doing any disciplinary actions to the thieves and corrupt within his very circle making him appear SPINELESS, POWERLESS, CAN BE EASILY FOOLED and thus INCAPABLE to lead the church to a holy, without spot or blemish, and worthy of salvation come Judgment Day, and ultimately,
Replace the present Executive Minister, Bro. Eduardo V. Manalo, by SOMEONE who has the capacity to restore the church to its clean and glorious posture like the time of Bro. Eraño G. Manalo’s unblemished leadership.
THIS IS THE MASTER PLAN OF THE DEVIL AGAINST THE TRUE CHURCH OF CHRIST IN THESE LAST DAYS USING AE’s GROUP!
BUT, they will fail, they will certainly reap God’s wrath. Those who will remain in AE’s devilish scheme will perish and be destroyed. Their fate will be the same like those who went against the leadership of Bro. Felix Manalo and Bro. Eraño G. Manalo.
To the group of AE, these warnings of the Apostle Thaddeus and the Apostle Peter came to pass;
"But these speak evil of whatever they do not know; and whatever they know naturally, like brute beasts, in these things they corrupt themselves. 11Woe to them! For they have gone in the way of Cain, have run greedily in the error of Balaam for profit, and perished in the rebellion of Korah.
12These are spots in your love feasts, while they feast with you without fear, serving only themselves. They are clouds without water, carried about by the winds; late autumn trees without fruit, twice dead, pulled up by the roots;
13raging waves of the sea, foaming up their own shame; wandering stars for whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever." (Jude 1:10-13 NKJV)
"and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority. They are presumptuous, self-willed. They are not afraid to speak evil of dignitaries.
12But these, like natural brute beasts made to be caught and destroyed, speak evil of the things they do not understand, and will utterly perish in their own corruption," (2 Peter 2:10,12 NKJV)
Furthermore, the Apostle Thaddeus instructs us to;
"save others by snatching them out of the fire; and to others show mercy mixed with fear, BUT HATE THEIR VERY CLOTHES, STAINED BY THEIR SINFUL LUSTS." (Jude 1:23 TEV)
THEREFORE,
WE HATE THEIR EVIL WAYS OF LIVING! WE HATE THEIR LIES! WE HATE THEIR DECEPTIONS AND MISREPRESENTATIONS! WE HATE THEIR EVIL DESIRES!
WE HATE THEIR SINFUL, UNLAWFUL, SELFISH, AND INSATIABLE LUSTS FOR WEALTH AND POWER!
Good to see these helpful information here,Thanks lots for sharing them with us.
ReplyDeleteProperty Boulevard
Property Management Software